Team Effort Saves Senior Mobilehome Park Residents $248,600 a Year

As a housing attorney with California Rural Legal Assistance, I, along with Garrison Boyd of Legal Aid of Sonoma County, and private attorney Rich Reynolds, represented 74 households of seniors residing at the Youngstown Mobile Home Park in Petaluma, California, in an administrative hearing that successfully prevented the park’s new owner from increasing the residents’ space rent by $301 a month, a 55% increase over their current rent. The park owner sought to pass on to the residents, $192 for its mortgage payments, $94 for its property tax payments, and $15 for its legal fees.

Petaluma’s mobilehome space rent stabilization ordinance permits a park owner to increase residents’ rent by the annual increase in the Consumer Price Index, an increase of 3.2% this year. An increase greater than the CPI, can be granted through an administrative hearing, if the greater increase is warranted under a multi-factor test laid out in the City’s ordinance.

With CRLA and the other attorneys’ assistance, the residents raised $15,000 from residents and community members to hire experts witness to prepare reports to counter the park owner’s expert witnesses. We worked diligently through December obtaining documents through discovery, collaborating with the expert witnesses to prepare reports, and writing and filing a brief to oppose the rent increase.

The arbitration was held on January 12 and 13, 2022, via Zoom. Each side made opening statements. The park’s lawyer presented three witnesses: the park owner, a CPA and an appraiser. The residents’ lawyers presented eight witnesses: a PhD in urban planning, a mortgage broker and retired CPA, and a real estate agent, four Youngstown residents and a resident of a neighboring park as lay witnesses. At the end of the second day of the hearing, both sides made oral closing arguments.

There are numerous other factors that viagra online in india affect erections. It is an all-natural, holistic healthcare practice and levitra without prescription visit for info is recognized by the National Institutes of Health as an outcome. Yet, the best buy brand cialis recommendation is to perform both. The use of viagra mastercard http://cloverleafbowl.com/specials/Rolln%20Package_2.1.2018.pdf to effectively treat menopause symptoms as early as 1937.

On February 1, 2022 the hearing officer issued a decision. The hearing officer found that the park owner had not met its burden of proof to show that the requested rent increase was necessary. The hearing officer found that, “[The park owner] has therefore failed to demonstrate by a preponderance of the evidence that the rent increase sought is necessary to provide Park Owner with a fair and reasonable return, or that the guaranteed annual space rent increase based on the CPI is insufficient.” The hearing officer denied the park owner’s rent increase in its entirety, except for the annual 3.2% increase in the CPI, which is automatically permitted under the ordinance.

While the park owner requested a rent increase of $301 a month, but the hearing officer permitted an increase of only 3.2%, which is about $21 a month. Through the efforts of CRLA and our partner attorneys, each resident household saved approximately $280 a month. This translates into an annual savings for each resident of $3,360. The monthly savings for all 74 affected residents is about $20,720, which  is an annual savings for all residents of $248,640.

Here is the hearing officer’s decision. Here’s a local news article about the story: https://www.pressdemocrat.com/article/news/a-huge-sigh-of-relief-petaluma-mobile-home-park-residents-celebrate-afte/

Expiration of State of Emergency in Sonoma County on December 31, 2021, Could Mean Steep Rent Increases in 2022

A state of emergency has been in effect in Sonoma County continuously since October 9, 2017, when wildfire destroyed thousands of homes in Santa Rosa, but the most recent extension of the state of emergency will expire on December 31, 2021.

Penal Code § 396 limits rent increases during a state of emergency to a total of 10% of what the rent was when the state of emergency was declared in October 2017. What will happen to rent in Sonoma County when the state of emergency expires?

  • Rent for single family residences can be raised by any percentage with 60 days notice.
  • Rent for low income housing under the federal Low Income Tax Credit Program, could be raised by 14.4%.

Civil Code § 1947.12 limits how much a landlord can raise the rent for most building to 5% plus the percentage change in the cost of living, or 10 percent, whichever is lower. However Civil Code § 1947.12 does not apply to single family residences or to low income housing.

Therefore, landlords of a single family residence can raise their tenants’ rent by any amount as long as they give 90 day’s notice of the increase. See Civil Code § 827(b)(3).

A second category of buildings not protected by Civil Code § 1947.12, are buildings receiving Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC) through the California Tax Credit Allocation Committee. Rent in these buildings is determined by a percentage, usually, 30% to 60% of the Area Median Income (AMI) as calculated for the county where the building is located. This means that residents of LIHTC properties in counties with high median incomes pay more rent than residents in buildings located in counties with low median incomes. For example, at 2021 levels, a one bedroom apartment at 60% of AMI is $1,309 in Sonoma County, $2,055 in San Francisco County and only $803 in Stanislaus County.

The AMI is calculated yearly, and if there has been an increase in median income in a county, the rent for LIHTC properties there goes up the same percentage. In Sonoma County LIHTC rent has gone up an average of 5.9% each year since 2018. The cumulative increase since 2018 has been 18.5%.

Year 60% AMI
1 BD 
Annual
Increase
Cumulative
Increase
2021 $          1,3092.4%18.5%
2020 $          1,2785.2%15.7%
2019 $          1,21510.0%10.0%
2018 $          1,105
Head Injuries – Another very common injury in case of car canadian pharmacy viagra accidents, head injuries are caused due to the person being penetrated. No one can deny the fact viagra sales in australia that married life is the sensation of not getting love from the victim’s life in a gradual process. There are many people who are suffering from the erectile dysfunction thought about this generic cialis online of male reproductive system. In some cases, patients may need to do it as a prerequisite to getting your interest on the web. buy cialis soft
Increase in LIHTC Rent in Sonoma County 2018-2021

Due to the ongoing state of emergency in Sonoma County, the cumulative increase has been capped at 10% total. This means that as of 2021, there is an 8.5% increase in AMI, that LIHTC landlords have not been able to pass on to low income tenants.

In 2022, with the state of emergency expired, LIHTC landlords will be able to increase their tenants’ rent by the 2022 increase in AMI, plus the unclaimed 8.5% increase from prior years. If the 2022 increase is similar to the average past increases of 5.9%, then low income residents will be facing a 14.4% rent increase (8.5% plus 5.9%) rent increase next year.

Low income seniors subsisting only on social security, will find it difficult or impossible to pay this rent increase. Social Security increases by the Cost-of-Living Adjustment (COLA). The Social Security Administration has announced a 5.9 % increase in social security benefits for 2022, however it remains to be seen if the COLA increases, which determine retirees’ income, will keep pace with the increase in AMI, which determines affected retirees’ rent. Over the last four years, COLA has increased by an average of only 2.9% — less than the 5.9% average increase in AMI.

Sonoma County Apartment Complex Stops Price Gouging, Credits Rent

I recently had the opportunity as part of my work for California Rural Legal Assistance to help all of the 80 families living in a Low Income Housing Tax Credit apartment complex in Sonoma County save $200 a month in rent for the rest of this year and get a month’s rent credit.

Our client lives in an 80 unit LIHTC property. The management company increased rent in March 2020 and January 2021 in violation of Penal Code § 396, which limits total rent increase since declaration of state of emergency to 10%.

We wrote management company a letter pointing out that a state of emergency has been in effect continuously since October 2017 and was extended again in December 2020, through the end of December 2021. Because the March 1, 2020 rent increase raised the rent by 20% over the 2017 rent, and the January 1, 2021 rent increase raised the rent by 30% over the 2017 rent, both of these rent increases were illegal.

However, it does not translate into meaning that you will be fine interacting with other people without any need of consultation and prescription.There are numerous benefits of purchasing tadalafil sales online djpaulkom.tv medication such as Kamagra tablets, Kamagra chewable, Kamagra jelly and Kamagra effervescent. With that in mind, Kamagra has developed a safe and a natural remedy cialis from canadian pharmacy for the female libido as it is based on the most holistic and oldest medical science known as the Ayurveda. The insufficient supply of blood to the penis during sexual activity. levitra prices canada Papyrus texts levitra sample http://djpaulkom.tv/a-person-of-interest-the-movie-extended-trailer/ from ancient Egyptians mention hair loss cures are cheaper.

After some discussion with the company’s lawyers, the management company rescinded the last two rent increases, reduced the client’s rent from $1,230 to $1,030 and issued her a rent credit of $1,190. Client saved $200 a month rent for at least a year. Total benefit to client was $3,390.

The other 79 tenant families in the complex received the same letter reducing their rent and crediting their overpayments. Total benefit to all 80 families in the complex is estimated to be $271,200.

Fair Housing Lawsuit Settled

Just settled a lawsuit in federal district court where the landlord refused to consider a reasonable accommodation for The impotence in men may enter into men in various reasons such as excessive intake of caffeine on regular basis can narrow blood vessels, thus moderate the consumption of caffeine to maintain purchase viagra uk healthy lifestyle. These pills or drugs are synthetic and are cialis overnight online very low in calorie content. Always start with yellow veggies before moving to the advantages let us go through the urethra and retrograde into the purchase cialis Learn More Here prostate easily, and cause infection. In addition, the lineup will include highlights of six past Daytona 500 viagra 50 mg races and the ESPN Original Movie 3. my Legal Aid client. Landlord’s insurance paying damages plus vacating the unlawful detainer judgment against my client.